Martin van Staden, from the Free Market Foundation, explains how the NHI threatens your constitutional rights and access to healthcare…

When seeking care from a hospital or doctor, patients will now be required to present their proof of registration with the National Health Insurance (NHI) Fund to access healthcare services. Registration can be refused. Never before have South Africans’ constitutional right to access to healthcare been so brazenly threatened by a power-hungry government. Civil society must resist the proposed NHI scheme with all its might.

According to the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, “patient self-determination is a central ethical principle of medical care”, and “every person has the right to make decisions regarding his or her health autonomously, even if these decisions appear irrational to third parties”.

This principle can also be found in the text of our Constitution.

Section 27(1)(a) provides that everyone has the right to have access to healthcare services, and section 27(2) obliges the State to progressively realise this right. These provisions must be read within the context of the commitment in section 1(a) of the Constitution – the founding values – which says that South Africa is founded upon the advancement of human rights and freedoms. These and other provisions clearly indicate a constitutional right to free choice as far as healthcare is concerned.

WIN a R 2,000 Woolworths Voucher

Subscribe to our Free Daily All4Women Newsletter to enter

But the NHI practically destroys self-determination insofar as it relates to choosing and receiving medical care.

The Constitution does not empower the government to set aside South Africans’ healthcare choices in favour of its own preferences. Indeed, the best interpretation one can assign to section 27 is that government must fund the healthcare services of the poor, something the NHI assuredly does not do.

The NHI makes comprehensive medical aid impossible

The NHI, instead, makes it impossible for South Africans to continue to have comprehensive medical aid as they currently can.

Instead, if the scheme is signed into law, South Africans’ right to choose their medical care will be denied if health providers do not think there is a “medical necessity” or if there is “no cost-effective intervention” for the condition. If the medical product or treatment they seek is also not in some government-approved list, they will not receive it. This is according to section 7(4) of the NHI Bill. In other words, if one is faced with an uncommon ailment that costs a significant amount of money to treat, treatment will be denied.

NHI model will harm the entire SA healthcare system – SAPPF

Forcing South Africans to pay triple for their healthcare

Care seekers may still purchase those services directly if they wish and can afford it, further illustrating how NHI will also serve to milk the South African taxpayer dry by forcing them to now pay triple for their healthcare: what they currently pay for private healthcare, what they currently pay for the existing State healthcare system, and the extra they will need to pay for NHI. With the introduction of the NHI scheme, which is a partial monopolisation of the healthcare market, any remaining private care will itself become more expensive.

Section 5(1) of the bill requires anyone who seeks healthcare services to be registered with the NHI Fund. Section 5(5) makes it clear that registration, worryingly, may be refused. And most absurdly, given South Africa’s history of requiring people to justify themselves to the authorities in the most innocuous circumstances (like seeking a job in a ‘white’ area), section 5(8) requires healthcare users to present their proof of their registration with the Fund to their healthcare service provider before they can be assisted.

Click page 2 below for more…

Accommodation offers from

20,000 listings in 2,000 locations with 10,000 reviews.

 

While All4Women endeavours to ensure health articles are based on scientific research, health articles should not be considered as a replacement for professional medical advice. Should you have concerns related to this content, it is advised that you discuss them with your personal healthcare provider.